Kadenwood

Debt Advisory

Refinancing, run before the calendar decides it.

A maturity eighteen months out is a negotiation. The same maturity two quarters out is a request, and lenders price the difference. The work is knowing which conversation you are in, and starting the right one early.

When does a refinancing become a mandate?

Three situations bring borrowers to us. A maturity inside the next two years, where the question is whether to term out early, extend with the existing lender, or run the facility to market. A structure the business has outgrown, where pricing, covenants, or amortization were set for a smaller or riskier company than the one that now exists. And a facility drifting toward its covenants, where a refinancing done early is the alternative to a waiver negotiated late.

The common error is treating the maturity date as the deadline. The real deadline sits well before it: auditors raise going-concern language over near-dated maturities, customers and suppliers read the same signals, and an incumbent lender's amend-and-extend terms harden as the alternatives thin out. The negotiation that decides a maturity's outcome starts well before the notice period does.

Not every situation needs a full refinancing. An amendment, an extension with the incumbent, or a repricing can each be the better answer, and part of the mandate is establishing which, on evidence, before any lender is approached.

Where do refinancing conditions sit right now?

The calendar is the fact that matters most: 2028 maturities run nearly six times 2027's, so the wall sits a year further out than most borrowers assume, and the market has already started working it. A record $106 billion of amend-and-extend volume ran through the first half of 2026, up 26% year on year (PitchBook LCD, 17 July 2026), and Lincoln International estimates that 30% to 40% of direct lending deals maturing in the next two years have already extended once (Lincoln International, 11 February 2026).

Waiting for cheaper base rates is not a plan the forward market supports. Three-month SOFR is priced at 3.90% at the end of 2026 and 4.04% at the end of both 2027 and 2028 (Blue Gamma, 4 August 2026). A borrower deferring a refinancing into that curve is buying time it will pay for twice: once in the rate and once in the thinner field of lenders still open when the wall's heaviest year arrives.

The full pricing picture, and how to read the default statistics that describe this market, is maintained in the linked positions below, with every figure dated and attributed.

How the process differs from a new raise.

It starts with the existing documents, not the market. The credit agreement is read for prepayment mechanics, call protection, required consents, and what the incumbent can and cannot block. The maturity schedule, amortization, and cash-sweep obligations are mapped against the forecast. Only then does it run like a raise: credit story, model, shortlist, term sheets, documentation.

The incumbent lender is a workstream of its own. It holds information advantages and switching costs work in its favour, but it also has a renewal decision to make and a relationship to price. Running the incumbent alongside a real outside process, rather than instead of one, is what converts a renewal quote into a market quote.

Timing is the judgment call the mandate is mostly about. Refinancing early, while the business is performing and capital is available, is a materially different conversation from refinancing into a near-dated wall. Early costs a little optionality. Late costs the negotiation.

What lenders test on a refinancing.

Why the debt is being replaced, first. A refinancing that funds growth, or terms out a maturity on a performing credit, reads differently from one that papers over a coverage problem, and lenders price the difference. The use of proceeds and the story behind it have to be stated precisely, because they will be diligenced precisely.

Then the record under the existing facility: covenant compliance history, amendments and waivers already taken, and how reporting obligations were met. A clean record is an asset that most borrowers never think to present. A blemished one is manageable when it is disclosed and explained rather than discovered.

Then the standard credit work, done to the refinancing's particular question: coverage under a downside case at the new pricing, not the old, and the next refinancing path after this one. Lenders do not lend to the last facility. They lend to the exit from this one.

Questions

Before the maturity gets close.

How early should a refinancing start?

Earlier than feels necessary. The practical horizon is twelve to eighteen months before maturity: enough time to run a real process, absorb a market that turns unhelpful for a quarter, and still leave the amend-and-extend route open as a fallback rather than a last resort. Starting early costs little. Starting late converts every conversation into a request.

Is extending with the existing lender simpler than refinancing?

Simpler, yes. Cheaper, not reliably. An incumbent quotes what retention is worth to it, and without an outside process the borrower has no way to test that number. Extensions also carry their own price: fees, a margin step, tighter terms, sometimes a paydown. The disciplined answer is to prepare both routes and let the terms decide, which is what an advisor's process exists to do.

What if the business is under-performing its covenants?

Then sequencing matters more, not less. A borrower drifting toward a breach has more options twelve months out than three: a refinancing into a structure the current performance supports, an amendment negotiated from compliance rather than default, or junior capital that resets headroom. The options narrow with the calendar, and the incumbent's information advantage grows with it. This is the situation where advice earns its fee soonest.

Transaction credentials available upon request.

More advisory